NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
When the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) shuts down the airspace over a major American city for “special security reasons,” Americans should pay attention.
On Feb. 10, the FAA grounded flights in and out of El Paso International Airport. The original notice referred to a 10-day flight restriction, but it was rescinded the same day. Flights resumed. The questions, however, remain.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy later stated that the FAA and the Department of War had acted to address a cartel-related drone incursion, neutralizing the threat before reopening the airspace. No further operational details were released.
Subsequent reporting suggested the closure may have been precautionary and that full operational details have not been publicly disclosed.
Even without those details, the episode matters. It indicates that federal authorities assessed the drone activity as serious enough to affect civilian aviation.Â
MEXICAN CARTEL DRONES BREACH US AIRSPACE, ARE DISABLED BY WAR DEPARTMENT, DUFFY SAYS
Cartels Are Adapting
For decades, Mexican drug trafficking organizations have moved illicit narcotics — including fentanyl — into the United States. Federal assessments consistently identify synthetic opioids as one of the deadliest threats facing American communities.
Cartels adjust when enforcement pressure changes. As land routes tighten and maritime interdiction increases, new methods emerge.
FBI RAMPS UP COUNTER-DRONE EFFORTS AS PATEL WARNS OF GROWING THREATS FROM CRIMINALS, TERRORISTS
In 2024, NORAD Commander Gen. Gregory M. Guillot testified that more than 1,000 drone incidents per month were occurring along the southern border, primarily for surveillance or smuggling. If routine drone activity has been tolerated along the border, then federal officials concluded the El Paso incident warranted halting operations at a major American airport.Â
Commercial drone platforms are widely available and attractive to criminal organizations. They are inexpensive, difficult to detect and capable of carrying meaningful payloads. Around the world, similar systems have migrated from recreational use to combat applications.
Their use by cartels is not speculative.
What appears new is the decision to disrupt commercial aviation in response.
That raises an obvious question: Was this an escalation in capability, proximity or perceived threat? Absent further disclosure, the public cannot know.
The Broader Drone Environment
Conflicts abroad have demonstrated how low-cost unmanned systems can be adapted for surveillance, targeting and even kinetic missions. Non-state actors learn from those examples. Criminal organizations are no exception.
WAR SECRETARY HEGSETH HIGHLIGHTS US ‘DRONE DOMINANCE’ PUSH FOR MASS ADOPTION IN MODERN WARFARE
None of this establishes that weaponized cartel drones are operating over American cities. There is no public evidence of that. But the technological threshold continues to decline.
The airspace over the Southwest is no longer immune to innovation.
TRUMP’S WAR ON CARTELS ENTERS NEW PHASE AS EXPERTS PREDICT WHAT’S NEXT
A Shift in U.S. Policy
The El Paso incident also fits within a broader change in how Washington frames cartel activity.
In January 2025, the Trump administration designated several major drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists. That classification moved cartel networks beyond a purely criminal framework and into the national security category.
CARTEL DRONES POSE ‘DANGEROUS’ DRUG TRAFFICKING RISK IN BORDER STATE, OFFICIAL WARNS
Federal agencies were directed to apply structural pressure against cartel enablers — financial systems, coordination networks and international supply chains.
The FAA decision did not occur in isolation. It occurred within a posture that treats cartel activity as a cross-border security threat.
What the El Paso Shutdown Tells Us
Several conclusions follow.
First, federal authorities assessed an aerial threat serious enough to affect civilian aviation.
PENTAGON EXPLORING COUNTER-DRONE SYSTEMS TO PREVENT INCURSIONS OVER NATIONAL SECURITY FACILITIES
Second, the Department of War was prepared to respond.
Third, public transparency remains limited. Members of Congress, including Rep. Veronica Escobar, have noted that drone incursions along the border are not new. If this episode reflected a heightened or qualitatively different threat, that distinction should be explained clearly.
When civilian airspace is restricted, clarity strengthens public trust.
Temporary closures of this magnitude should remain exceptional — not routine.
Policy Implications
Border Airspace
The United States needs a defined border airspace doctrine. That includes persistent detection capability, streamlined counter-UAS authority for DHS and DoD near the border, and clear standards for when civilian airspace restrictions are justified.
HEGSETH SAYS US STRIKES FORCE SOME CARTEL LEADERS TO HALT DRUG OPERATIONS
Reactive shutdowns are not strategy.
Deterrence
If drone incursions continue, interception alone will not suffice. Disabling individual aircraft addresses the symptom, not the network behind it. Financiers, suppliers and planners enabling these operations must face sustained financial, legal and diplomatic pressure.
MEXICO’S PRESIDENT FIRMLY REFUSES TRUMP’S PROPOSAL FOR US MILITARY STRIKES AGAINST CARTELS
Deterrence requires credibility. The United States has both the authority and the obligation to defend its territory and airspace. Persistent aerial incursions cannot become normalized.
Mexico remains central to a durable solution. Joint enforcement and intelligence cooperation are preferable to confrontation. But history shows that when cross-border threats harm Americans, the United States responds.
Cartels adjust when the cost of operating rises. The objective is to restore control before escalation becomes necessary.
Mexico’s Role
Mexico’s cooperation is indispensable.
Public escalation benefits neither nation. Quiet coordination—shared intelligence, joint surveillance, and coordinated counter-drone efforts—offers a more stable path. Quiet coordination, shared intelligence, joint surveillance and coordinated counter-drone efforts offer a more stable path.
At the same time, persistent violations of U.S. airspace cannot be ignored. Bilateral security cooperation will either deepen or strain under pressure.
The Strategic Choice
The El Paso shutdown may prove to be an isolated episode. It may also mark the first visible sign that cartel operations have expanded decisively into the air domain.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
If criminal networks can probe American airspace without consequence, they will continue assessing its limits.
The administration now faces a choice: respond incident by incident — or establish durable control of the skies along the southern border.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The ground border has dominated debate for years. The airspace above it may soon demand equal attention.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ROBERT MAGINNIS
